The National Probation Service for England and Wales is a statutory criminal justice service, mainly responsible for the supervision of offenders in the community and the provision of reports to the criminal courts to assist them in their sentencing duties. It was established in its current form by the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act in April 2001, but has existed since 1907 as a set of area based services interacting at arms-length with central government.
Northern Ireland has its own probation service, whilst in Scotland criminal justice social work services are managed within the social work departments of local authorities.
The service is part of the Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), which transferred to the Ministry of Justice from the Home Office on 9 May 2007. It comprises 42 probation areas which are coterminous with police force area boundaries, served by 35 probation trusts. Trusts are funded by NOMS and employ all staff except the chief officer; they are accountable to their boards (comprising up to fifteen members appointed by the Secretary of State) for day-to-day operations and financial management, and to NOMS via a Regional Offender Manager, with whom they have service level agreements, for performance against the targets for the offender management and interventions services for which they have been funded.
The work of probation trusts is scrutinised by NOMS, which reports independently to UK government ministers; and by HM Inspectorate of Probation. There are concerns that staff shortages, failure in communication and privatisation may be weakening the probation service and putting the public at risk.
Maps, Directions, and Place Reviews
History
The Church of England Temperance Society and other voluntary societies appointed missionaries to the London police courts during the late nineteenth century. From this developed the system of releasing offenders on the condition that they kept in touch with the missionary and accepted guidance. In 1907 this supervision was given a statutory basis which allowed courts to appoint and employ probation officers.
The service, at the start of 2004, had some 18,000 staff. Statistics for the year 2002 state that it supervised just less than 193,000 offenders and provided 253,000 pre-sentence reports to courts in England and Wales, advising them on the background of and proposing appropriate sentences for convicted offenders. In addition, it has responsibility for ensuring that victims of violent and sexual crime resulting in prison sentences of over 12 months are consulted before offenders are released from custody.
The advent of NOMS in 2004 changed the pattern of correctional services delivery in England and Wales. The Offender Management Bill, introduced in Parliament late in 2006, was intended to enable probation areas to become trusts as part of wider government policy to open up the provision of correctional services to greater competition from the voluntary, community, and private sectors. This was one of the recommendations of the Carter Report (2003): others were to introduce a system of end-to-end offender management, with one named offender manager having responsibility for an offender throughout his or her sentence (be it in custody, the community, or both), and to rebalance sentencing in order to redress the drift towards less and less serious offences resulting in imprisonment or community sentences. Carter saw the need to improve public and sentencer confidence not only in community sentences but also in the fine as credible sanctions for appropriate offenders and offences.
The Bill completed its passage through Parliament in July 2007, and the first six probation trusts came into being on 1 April 2008 (Merseyside, South Wales, Humberside, Dyfed/Powys, West Mercia and Leicestershire & Rutland). Lancashire Probation Trust achieved Trust status on 1 April 2009.
Probation trusts
The operational elements of probation in England and Wales were provided by 35 regional probation trusts.
These were:
- Avon & Somerset Probation Trust
- Bedfordshire Probation Trust
- Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Probation Trust
- Cheshire Probation Trust
- Cumbria Probation Trust
- Derbyshire Probation Trust
- Devon and Cornwall Probation Trust
- Dorset Probation Trust
- Durham Tees Valley Probation Trust
- Essex Probation
- Gloucestershire Probation Trust
- Greater Manchester Probation Trust
- Hampshire Probation Trust
- Hertfordshire Probation Trust
- Humberside Probation Trust
- Kent Probation
- Lancashire Probation Trust
- Leicestershire Rutland Probation Trust
- Lincolnshire Probation Trust
- London Probation Trust
- Merseyside Probation Trust
- Norfolk & Suffolk Probation Trust
- Nottinghamshire Probation Trust
- Northamptonshire Probation Trust
- Northumbria Probation Trust
- South Yorkshire Probation Trust
- Staffordshire & West Midlands Probation Trust
- Surrey & Sussex Probation Trust
- Thames Valley Probation
- Wales Probation Trust
- Warwickshire Probation Trust
- West Mercia Probation Trust
- West Yorkshire Probation Trust
- Wiltshire Probation Trust
- York & North Yorkshire Probation Trust
Criticism
An article in The Guardian suggests privatisation of the probation service was done in haste, underfunded and is failing.
The probation service in London is understaffed and many probation officers are inexperienced. Probationers are seen too infrequently and some are overlooked. A proper risk assessment is not done in the majority of cases. Pivatisation of probation service continues to produce "troubling" results. The Chief Inspector of Pobation disclosed that probation supervision for one in four low-risk offenders in Gwent is no more than a phone call every six weeks.
Source of the article : Wikipedia
EmoticonEmoticon